Legal Opinion
Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 12, 1987No. 513-87CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
After this case was transferred from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff’s contract claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has opposed, and argument has been held.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. Plaintiff Tennessee Valley Authority (“plaintiff” or “TVA”) and the Atomic Energy Commission entered into two contracts, AT-(40-l)-3760 and AT-(40-l)-3761, on December 1, 1967. For purposes of this order, the Department of Energy (“DOE”), a successor to the Atomic Energy…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- State v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Aldridge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.