Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Kaufman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1917No. 23,277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Wabash Circuit Court; William H. Eichhorn, Special Judge. Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of the Board of Commissioners of Hamilton county, against Roscoe A. Kaufman and another. From a judgment for defendants, the relator appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

At the September, 1906, term of the Huntington Circuit Court, in a certain drainage proceeding in which appellee Kaufman was the petitioner, bills for services rendered by the drainage commissioners, rodmen, axmen, and for materials used by them, *604aggregating $1,559.75, were by that court allowed and the same were paid by the county treasurer of Huntington county, Indiana, in November, 1906. This action was brought to compel appellees to reimburse the county for the money thus paid. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and this ruling is assigned as error.

The drainage proceedings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monger v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Heaston v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Moorhouse v. KunkalmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Opp v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kaufman v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Payne, President v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Claridge v. PhelpsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Steury v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Indiana Trust Co. v. Beagley, TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. SlussIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API