Pierce v. Egbert

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

If the trial court believed the evidence given by the receiver, he was justified in holding Mr. Pierce in contempt. This indicates the conflict in the evidence, and this court can not interfere with the judgment on the weight of the evidence. Moreover, if we were disposed so to do, we could not, as the judgment confirming the sale is conclusive until set aside by proper action for that purpose.

The entry of confirmation of sale was entered of record September 28, 1929. So long as this judgment entry remains in full force and effect; it is binding upon the purchaser.…