Jarusz v. Namon

delivered-the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover $325 claimed to be due him for services rendered by him as a real estate salesman for the defendant, who was a real estate broker. There was a trial before the court without a jury and a finding and judgment in favor of the ulaintiff for the amount of his claim.

The record discloses that the defendant was engaged in the real estate business in Chicago and was licensed under the statute of this State to conduct such business; that- he employed plaintiff as a salesman, who was not licensed under the…