Legal Opinion

In re Thigpen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 31, 2000No. S00Y0185, S00Y0240PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

These disciplinary matters are before the Court on the Petition for Voluntary Discipline of Respondent Wayne P. Thigpen. The State Bar does not object to the Court accepting Thigpen’s petition. Thigpen admits violating Standards 4 (a lawyer shall not engage in professional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or wilful misrepre*46sentation); 22 (b) (a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his client, including giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. In re ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API