Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Group v. Parrish

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1972No. Nos. 71-1017, 71-1018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated appeals are from the same order of equitable proration which apportioned the amount of a personal injury settlement agreement pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 440.39, F.S.A. The appellant is the workmen’s compensation carrier for the injured minor appellee.

Three points are argued. The first urges that the order must be reversed because the procedure followed in the trial court was improper. We agree that the procedure was not in accord with the statute and the case law concerning the subject; nevertheless, we hold that no reversible error has been demonstrated since the appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardware Mutual Insurance Company v. RothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Jones v. Life Insurance Co. of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Walker v. Narose Bldgs., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio Cas. Group v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Ohio Casualty Group v. Parrish ex rel. ParrishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Ohio Casualty Group v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API