Legal Opinion

Ferguson-McKinney Co. v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This is an action instituted against appellees by appellant to recover on an account for merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered. The account was for $132.56, the price of a bill of goods verbally ordered by appellees, and they pleaded, among other defenses, that the oral contract was void under the statute of frauds, which provides that a contract for the sale of goods, etc.,-for a price in excess of thirty dollar's, -shall not be binding unless ‘‘there be s-ome note or memorandum signed by the party to be charged; or, second, the purchaser shall accept a part of the goods so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caulkins v. . HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Denmead v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Brown v. BishopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  4. Maxwell v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Rubber Co. v. Bercher's Royal Tire Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API