Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1998No. 20477PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold, in this interlocutory appeal from the denial of motions to dismiss, that Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 852-1 (1993), which prohibits the obstruction of “ingress to or egress from any public or private place,” is not constitutionally vague on its face. Further, we cannot conclude, on the record of the ease thus far, that as a matter of law HES § 852-1 was unconstitutionally applied to Defendants-Appellants John Guzman, Jr. (Guzman), Brian K. Kawahara, Walter H. Kupau, Andrew Mancao, Samuel I. Nakamu-ra, Michael George Spain, Jr. (Spain), Wallace Minoru Takushi, and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KratsasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. JimHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Snyder Brothers, Inc. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API