Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. James

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1917No. 9,205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; James J. Moran, Special Judge. Action by Flavius V. James against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This action was begun by appellee ber fore a justice of the peace in Randolph county to recover the value of a horse alleged to have been killed on appellant’s right of way by one of its trains. Such proceedings were had in the case that it was finally tried in the Jay Circuit Court where appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for $100. A motion for new trial filed by appellant was overruled, whereupon it prayed an*d perfected this appeal.

*4581. The first error assigned and relied on for reversal charges that “the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Culver v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Jones v. DexterSupreme Court of Florida · 1859
  3. Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Vandalia Railroad v. State ex rel. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BecknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Calumet Foundry & Machine Co. v. MrozIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Fleming v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Templeman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Glasser v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API