Legal Opinion

Van Doren v. Thurber

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1943No. Civ. 3202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory relief, to cancel a lease of certain mining claims and to enjoin the defendant from going upon the claims or claiming any interest therein.

The lease, which was executed on March 8, 1939, recited that the claims were leased to the lessee for the sole purpose of exploring, operating, mining, developing and removing minerals “and to sell the products thereof and to pay to the lessor the royalties hereinafter particularly set forth.” It provided for a royalty of $1.00 per ton on ore of a certain mineral content with a proportionate higher or lower royalty for ore…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kern Sunset Oil Co. v. Good Roads Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McPherson v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julien v. GossnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. v. Sixteen to One Mining Corp. (In Re Sixteen to One Mining Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1981
  3. Rouse v. McDonoughColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API