Legal Opinion
Yasinsac v. Colonial Oil Properties, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 24, 2000No. A00A0945PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Vecie Yasinsac appeals an order of summary judgment on her negligence claims against Colonial Oil Properties, Inc., Enmark, Inc. and Enmark Stations, Inc. We affirm because we find that Yasinsac had knowledge of the alleged hazard equal to that of the defendants.
On March 6, 1997, Yasinsac went to an Enmark gas station in Kingsland. After her car was filled with gasoline, she went to pay at a booth occupied by an attendant. In front of the booth was a landing or step, 6.5 inches’high and 18 inches deep, that spanned the width of the booth. Yasinsac stepped onto the landing and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Caswell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Sullivan v. Quisc, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Davis v. GBR Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norman v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Ponder v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Delk v. Quiktrip Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Valdosta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.