Legal Opinion

Parrott & Co. v. Benson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1921No. 16224PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wright, J., entered September 20. 1920, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction, after a trial to the court on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— The respondent, as plaintiff below, brought this action to restrain appellant Benson, as commissioner of agriculture for this state, and appellant Adams, as chief of the division of the department of agriculture having direct charge of such matters, from enforcing the provisions of Laws of 1919, p. 290, ch. 120, and Laws of 1915, p. 274, ch. 94. The trial court reached the conclusion that a portion of subdivision (c) of § 1 of the act of 1915, was unconstitutional, and accordingly entered a decree perpetually restraining appellants and their successors in office from undertaking to enforce…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. North DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Weigle v. Curtice Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Hathaway v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. T.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. SCHOOL DISTRICTS'ALLIANCE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. School Districts' Alliance for Adequate Funding of Special Education v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API