Legal Opinion

In Re Ryan

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 20, 2007No. 2-19-20079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION & ORDER

CARL L. BUCKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

As amended by the State of New York in 2001, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code now provides that “[a] security interest does not exist under this article in ordinary building materials incorporated into an improvement on land.” N.Y.U.C.C. § 9-334(a)(McKinney 2002). In the present instance, the debtors object to the secured status of a claim that asserts a hen on a bathtub. The defining issue is whether that bathtub constitutes something other than an ordinary building material, so that it may be subject to a security interest.

In November…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Lumber Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. IRR Supply Centers, Inc. v. Metzgar (In Re Metzgar)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2008
  2. In Re AdkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Michael R. Evans and Kelly N. EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API