Legal Opinion

Durfee ex rel. Legal Representatives of the Estate of Rauscher v. Joslyn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Debt on administrator’s bond. Defendants Joslyn and Palmer bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion and in 92 Mich. 211.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Defendant Joslyn was appointed administrator of the estate of Marie Rauscher, deceased, and gave an 'administration bond in the sum of $1,000. Marie Rauscher died seised of a parcel of real estate, upqn which was a mortgage. Upon foreclosure sale this property brought the sum of $683.87 in excess of the mortgage, which sum was paid over to Joslyn as administrator. Some months later he obtained from the probate court a license* to sell the land, which he did, receiving therefor the sum of $830 in excess of the amount necessary to redeem the same, which amount of $830 came to his possession,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durfee v. JoslynMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siewert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API