Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Lindseth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1981No. 9218, CA 16628Published

1Opinion of the CourtBottler, J.

Petitioner appeals from an order approving, over his objections, the respondent personal representative’s final accounting and proposed distribution of the assets of decedent’s estate. Petitioner’s objections were: (1) that an inter vivos transfer of $3,000 by decedent to her grandson, Lloyd, constituted an ademption by satisfaction, by virtue of which Lloyd is entitled to nothing under the residuary clause of the will, and (2) that a long-term bank note, purchased by decedent’s guardian prior to her death with proceeds from the sale of her house, should pass under the will as a "cash” asset.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of LarsellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Larsell v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API