Legal Opinion
Carothers v. United Technologies, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs’ residence was damaged by fire on March 31, 1987. Their complaint alleges that the fire was caused by a defective manual shut-off valve in a propane gas dryer purchased from defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company on or about August 1, 1986. In addition to Sears, plaintiffs have sued Whirlpool Corporation, which allegedly negligently designed, manufactured and marketed the gas dryer, United Technologies, Inc., and Emerson Electric Company, which allegedly manufactured the manual shut-off valve. Following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Levy v. Gallery of Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Zawadzki v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Reynolds v. A. C. Towne Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Access Data Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kilduff v. Shulman Office Park AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levy v. Gallery of Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Centennial Insurance v. CapehartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Danielle W. v. Jentsch & Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023