Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lippert

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.

¶ 1 Carl Lippert challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of .10% or more. We vacate the judgment of sentence and discharge Appellant.

¶ 2 We first examine the evidence presented at Appellant’s jury trial. Monroe-ville Police Officer Safar 1 testified that from midnight to 4:00 a.m. on November 11, 2001, the Plum Borough Police Department and Monroeville Police Department were conducting a joint DUI checkpoint on Logans Ferry Road in Plum. When Appellant arrived at the checkpoint at approximately…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. MacPhersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. ModaffareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. SibleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Com. v. Booher, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Lawhorn, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Patrick, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API