Commonwealth v. Lippert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.
¶ 1 Carl Lippert challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of .10% or more. We vacate the judgment of sentence and discharge Appellant.
¶ 2 We first examine the evidence presented at Appellant’s jury trial. Monroe-ville Police Officer Safar 1 testified that from midnight to 4:00 a.m. on November 11, 2001, the Plum Borough Police Department and Monroeville Police Department were conducting a joint DUI checkpoint on Logans Ferry Road in Plum. When Appellant arrived at the checkpoint at approximately…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. MacPhersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ModaffareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SibleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Booher, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Lawhorn, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Patrick, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.