Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 31-90, (1990)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided November 5, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK R. VAZQUEZ, Corporation Counsel Clark County

You have asked for my opinion on two questions regarding the provision of a cement grave liner by a funeral home in a county burial pursuant to section 49.30, Stats. First, you ask whether cement grave liners are properly classified as funeral and burial expenses or as cemetery expenses. Second, you ask if "actual cemetery expenses" includes a manufacturer/supplier's or funeral director's markup or profit on the original invoice bill.

The answer to your first question is that the characterization of a good or service as a funeral and burial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Defenbaugh & Co. of Cleveland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1981
  2. Cassel v. Newark Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Chase v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API