Legal Opinion

Parker v. Chew

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1973No. 72-353PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff sued appellees-de-fendants for damages resulting from an automobile accident. The appellees denied negligence, and alleged that the appellant was guilty of contributory negligence. A jury returned its verdict for the appellant.

The appellees filed post-trial motions: (1) for a new trial, and (2) for judgment non obstante veredicto alleging eight grounds in support of the motions. After proper hearing, the trial judge granted the motion for new trial, specifically as to grounds five and six of the motion, that are set out in full:

5. There was no legal basis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Pyms v. MerandaSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Poindexter v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flowers v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API