Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1992No. 91-1105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The final judgment and sentence erroneously adjudicates James Bell guilty on count II of grand theft, rather than petit theft, the crime the court adjudicated him guilty of committing at the plea hearing, and imposes a sentence greater than the maximum provided for in the plea agreement and allowed by statute for the crime of petit theft.1 Thus, we reverse and remand the judgment and sentence with regard to count II.

We vacate the sentence imposed on count I and remand for resentencing on that count, because the record before the court at the time of sentencing did not affirmatively reflect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S.D.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. SDF v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API