Mertz v. Bradford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendants’ motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate special circumstances warranting the presence of either a medical representative or a stenographer at physical examinations to be conducted by doctors designated for that purpose by defendants. We repeat that the examining room should not " 'be turned into a hearing room with lawyers and *963stenographers from both sides participating’ ” (Casali v Phillips, 145 AD2d 941, 942, quoting Jakubowski v Lengen, 86 AD2d 398, 401). We also repeat that "where valid reasons exist,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosenblitt v. RosenblittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Casali v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grady v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Kattaria v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Kosanovich v. GrecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990