Holzenkamp v. Cincinnati Traction Co.
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
Heard on motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
This motion raises an interesting question, by ho means easy' of solution, namely: When and under what precise circumstances does one who intends to take passage upon the vehicle of a common carrier become a passenger to an extent entitling him to recover for injuries received through negligence of the carrier, under the law applicable as between carrier and passenger?
In the ease at bar the plaintiff, with others, had gone to a nearby street crossing, where defendant’s ears usually took up passengers, and stood near the track for the purpose of taking passage on said ears; and after the ear…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Barth v. Kansas City Elevated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Schepers v. Union Depot RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Allender v. C. R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.