Legal Opinion
Flinders v. Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2007No. 06-4133PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Blaine Flinders and David Brown, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, (referred to collectively as “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (“WFSP” or “the Plan”). Plaintiffs asserted claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), arguing that the Plan wrongfully denied them benefits. The parties filed cross motions for partial summary judgment on August 31,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Alane King, as Conservator and Natural Parent of Amber Lynn Schanus v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Caldwell v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Kellogg v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Holcomb v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.