Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Falkenbury v. Miles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Douglass, J.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the Attorney General, on behalf of the people, on relation of Smith Falkenbury, charging Marcus H. Miles, the defendant, with usurping the office of County Clerk of the County of. St. Clair, and requiring him to show his right thereto. In addition to the usxral averments contained in a pleading of this nature at the common law, the information alleges “ that said Smith Falkenbury, by virtue $id warrant of due and regular election, is in law and in right entitled to have, hold, and exercise” ■said…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Keeler v. RobertsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. State ex rel. Law v. SaxonSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  4. Attorney General Ex Rel. Cook v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Attorney General Ex Rel. Cook v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API