Korb v. Kowaleviocz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a party-witness’ statement, made under oath in open court in response to a question posed to him on cross-examination, that the opposing party was a “crook” is absolutely privileged and thus not actionable for defamation.
The factual posture of this case is relatively simple. On March 28,1977 George P. Korb Co., Inc. (Korb, Inc.), a home improvement company, of which the appellant, George P. Korb (Korb), is president and sole stockholder, entered into a contract with the appellee, Joseph M. Kowaleviocz, and his wife to perform certain work on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bartlett v. ChristhilfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Calkins v. SumnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Kennedy v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Maulsby v. ReifsniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Di Blasio v. KolodnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Rosenberg v. HelinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Miner v. NovotnyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Adams v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Offen v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.