Legal Opinion

Korb v. Kowaleviocz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 21, 1979No. [No. 127, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a party-witness’ statement, made under oath in open court in response to a question posed to him on cross-examination, that the opposing party was a “crook” is absolutely privileged and thus not actionable for defamation.

The factual posture of this case is relatively simple. On March 28,1977 George P. Korb Co., Inc. (Korb, Inc.), a home improvement company, of which the appellant, George P. Korb (Korb), is president and sole stockholder, entered into a contract with the appellee, Joseph M. Kowaleviocz, and his wife to perform certain work on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. ChristhilfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Calkins v. SumnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Kennedy v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Maulsby v. ReifsniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  5. Di Blasio v. KolodnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Rosenberg v. HelinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Miner v. NovotnyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Adams v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Offen v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API