Barry W. Sufrin v. Gerald D. Hosier, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
We have for decision an appeal and a cross-appeal from a split decision in a bitter dispute between two former law partners, Gerald Hosier and Barry Sufrin, patent lawyers who between 1984 and 1989 practiced law as Hosier & Sufrin, Ltd. In 1986 the firm was retained to handle a patent claim of Telesonics Systems Inc. on a contingent-fee basis. The following year Hosier, the more senior of the two lawyers and the one who had “landed” Telesonics as a client, negotiated a lucrative settlement that promised Teleso'nics tens of millions of dollars of patent-licensing fees.’…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Jeffrey Kemezy v. James PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re: Aimster Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Flava Works, Inc v. Marques RondaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Micro Data Base Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Dharma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- A.E.I. Music Network, Inc. v. Business Computers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.