Legal Opinion

Barry W. Sufrin v. Gerald D. Hosier, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 27, 1997No. 97-1132, 97-1241PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

We have for decision an appeal and a cross-appeal from a split decision in a bitter dispute between two former law partners, Gerald Hosier and Barry Sufrin, patent lawyers who between 1984 and 1989 practiced law as Hosier & Sufrin, Ltd. In 1986 the firm was retained to handle a patent claim of Telesonics Systems Inc. on a contingent-fee basis. The following year Hosier, the more senior of the two lawyers and the one who had “landed” Telesonics as a client, negotiated a lucrative settlement that promised Teleso'nics tens of millions of dollars of patent-licensing fees.’…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jeffrey Kemezy v. James PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. In Re: Aimster Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Flava Works, Inc v. Marques RondaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Dharma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. A.E.I. Music Network, Inc. v. Business Computers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API