Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1985No. 7995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment adjudging him to be a habitual offender and imposing an enhanced sentence pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (Cum.Supp.1984). The issues raised involve the validity of a prior conviction and whether a deferred sentence may be enhanced under the habitual offender statute. We hold that the prior challenged conviction is valid. However, we also hold that a deferred sentence cannot be enhanced. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for correction of the sentence.

There are three relevant felony convictions: 1) Defendant was convicted of unlawful…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Padilla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. KennemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API