State v. Davis
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals a judgment adjudging him to be a habitual offender and imposing an enhanced sentence pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (Cum.Supp.1984). The issues raised involve the validity of a prior conviction and whether a deferred sentence may be enhanced under the habitual offender statute. We hold that the prior challenged conviction is valid. However, we also hold that a deferred sentence cannot be enhanced. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for correction of the sentence.
There are three relevant felony convictions: 1) Defendant was convicted of unlawful…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Padilla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. KennemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986