Doerffler v. State

This is a prosecution under the liquor laws. The plaintiff in error was convicted in the trial court of a violation of chapter 93, Laws 1933. The constitutionality of the act was challenged, but in Allen v. State, p. 722, post, argued before the court the same day, that question has been resolved in favor of its validity. The discussion in that case need not be repeated here.

The plaintiff in error operated a grocery store in a building occupied also by a bakery, a meat market, barber shop, and a lunch counter. City police officers of Scottsbluff searched the building and found nine pints of…