State v. Hoekstra
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
The State appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing an indictment returned by a Clay County grand jury. We reverse.
Defendant-respondent was indicted by the grand jury August 11, 1977, for distribution of LSD. Six witnesses testified before the grand jury, only one of whom, a John Anderson, directly implicated defendant in the commission of a crime. About six months later, witness Anderson attempted to recant his grand jury testimony in defense counsel Charles Wolsky⅛ office. Attorney Wolsky warned Anderson that he could be prosecuted for perjury and that he should…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Ralph F. DeleoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- James J. Laughlin v. United States of America, Allan U. Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SalmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Springer-ErtlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KleinsasserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DorhoutSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.