Legal Opinion

In re Golenbock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in this State in 1939, was served with a petition over four months ago containing 12 charges of professional misconduct. He or his attorneys requested and were granted many extensions of time in which to answer, the last of which expired a week ago. No answer has been filed and respondent is in default.

*180Petitioners have moved to restrain respondent temporarily from practicing law, upon allegations of improprieties that will hereinafter be outlined.

' Respondent in turn moves for leave to open his default and interpose an answer. A copy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Rothschild v. HavilandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Heischober v. PolishookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. La Vin v. La VinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SteuerwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API