Legal Opinion

Studley v. Studley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1986No. 50436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn McManamon, J.

Wanda Studley, the plaintiff below, appeals a summary judgment which determined that her nine-year-old daughter Holly was not entitled to certain life insurance proceeds payable upon the death of the child’s father. The plaintiff’s appeal is well-taken.

The plaintiff divorced John Raymond Studley on April 14, 1975. At that time it is undisputed that Studley carried a contributory group life insurance policy with his employer Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill, Lynch”) as well as a $10,000 Metropolitan policy on his life.

The divorce journal contained the following directives…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Marshall v. AaronOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Houk v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Bank One Trust Co., N.A. v. Transamerica Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HousemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Aetna Life Ins. v. HusseyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Nalesnik v. NalesnikOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API