Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 2011No. 17-12491PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Chief Judge. Introduction

The United States Trustee (UST) has commenced an adversary proceeding to revoke the Debtors’ discharge. Before the Court is the Debtors’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The UST opposes the debtor’s motion. A hearing on the matter was held on April 19, 2011. The Court took the matter under advisement. For the reasons expressed below the motion will be granted. 1

Legal Standard

“Under Rule 12(c), judgment will not be granted unless the movant clearly establishes that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that he is entitled…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 421 Chestnut Partners, LP v. Aloia (In re Aloia)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Daryl R. RothmundUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Jenzack Partners, LLC v. RothmundUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Michael A. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Vara, (United States Trustee) v. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API