Michael Jackson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed. . Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant challenging the vol-untariness of his plea through a timely collateral motion. .See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. 1
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and. KLINGENSMITH, JJ;, concur.
1. We decline to consider the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion to withdraw plea because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed, at which point the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed. Also, no notice of appeal places that order before this court. Smith v. State, 113 So.3d 110, 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3Cited by2 opinions
- JILLIAN SCHAEFER vs STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Jilek v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017