Legal Opinion

United States v. Holtz

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided August 3, 2005No. 03-30057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

A question of fees for appointed defense counsel.

FACTS

The Government filed a criminal complaint against Defendant Jarrod Holtz on June 19, 2003. The Government subsequently indicted Holtz on three counts involving drug and firearms offenses. Holtz was indigent; therefore, the Court appointed defense counsel to represent him. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006(a) (hereinafter the “Criminal Justice Act” or “CJA”). On October 29, 2003, the Court continued the final pretrial conference and trial on co-defendant Justin Reardon’s motion. Rear-don, who was represented by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ralph C. Stone, C. Michael Seibert, Attorney-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. Scone Investments, L.P. v. American Third Market Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. United States v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MosleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  2. United States v. LedbetterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API