Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fielding v. Cerrato

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1992No. 91-608Published

1Concurrence

GRIFFIN, Judge,-

concurring specially.

I agree that the final judgment based on the jury verdict in this case should be affirmed. I write only to express my disagreement with the lower court’s ruling that the amount of compensation paid to an expert witness to testify in a medical malpractice case, or any case for that matter, is “irrelevant”. See, e.g., Langston v. King, 410 So.2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langston v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982