Stitt v. Casterline
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Kelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to meet with him for the purpose of determining the necessity fot the construction of a bridge on a county-line highway. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The relator, having taken the necessary and legal steps, under Act No. 230, Laws of 1889, for such meeting, asks the writ of mandamus against the respondent to compel him to meet with the relator for the purpose of determining and agreeing upon the exigency existing requiring that a bridge should be constructed on the county line between the counties of Clinton and Gratiot, o.ver Pine creek, on- the boundary line between the township of Fulton,'in-Gratiot county, and the township of Essex, in the county of Clinton, at the equal and joint expense of the said townships.
The main and pertinent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wrought Iron Bridge Co. v. Township of JasperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Delta Lumber Co. v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Bigelow v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Weller v. WheelockMichigan Supreme Court · 1908