Legal Opinion
Carter v. Bergeron
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 29, 1960No. 4813PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
As insurer of the GMC pickup truck which was some distance beyond the scene when the collision occurred, Peerless Insurance Company advances two principal contentions: first, that the Trial Court erred in submitting the case to the jury under the second count of the writ, and in particular in submitting the special question based on that count; and second, that its policy furnishes no coverage to Bergeron even if it could properly be found that his negligence in controlling the operation and speed of the truck operated by his employee caused or contributed to cause the accident.
I. In support…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. Of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Edith Joyce Murray LottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Caron v. American Motorists Insurance Co. of ChicagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Butzberger v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Hogle v. HogleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.