Legal Opinion

Ackley v. Nashua

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 19, 1960No. 4825PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

We first consider the following question transferred without ruling: “Does said Article IX, Section 45-A (5) [of the zoning ordinance of the city of Nashua] include in its meaning of the words ‘variance’ and ‘use variance’ an extension of an existing non-conforming use as applied for in this case?” *554That provision of the zoning ordinance reads as follows: “Any application for a variance in the use of land or a structure shall be accompanied by the written consent of the owners (as of record at the Assessor’s Office and the City Engineer’s Office) of sixty (60) per cent of all real property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMahon v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Amero v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dewitt v. Town of Brattleboro Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  2. New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Flanagan v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Isabelle v. Town of NewburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API