Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Frick
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Knox County Circuit Cou/rt. — Hon. Ben. E. Turner, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
— This is the second appeal in this case. 50 Mo. App. 275.
The action is for damages for the alleged violation of the following contract.:
“Wa Keeney, Kan., Nov. 13, 1889.
“10 head horses; 1 phaeton; 3 top buggies, one seated; 2 two seated buggies; 1 three seated spring wagon; 1 cart; 1 writing desk; 1 stove, chairs, lamps and forks; 9 wraps, — 2 hair wraps; 1 lumber wagon; 6 sets double harness; 2 sets single harness; 1 cow; valued at $1,854.00. I this day agree that, if Mr. A. C. Frick will clean up and ship to me at Marceline, Mo., the above property (less cow and wagon, which he may sell for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turner v. MellierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Butler v. MannySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Robertson v. TapleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Craycroft v. W. G. Walker & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Freeland v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Window Glass Co. v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Sidebottom v. SidebottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bradner v. Rockdale Powder Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Hopkins v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Midland Elevator Co. v. Cleary & HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898