Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 3, 1923No. 26243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, O. J.

The question propounded is whether a municipal ordinance which appellant stands convicted of having violated is contrary to the due process clause and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (section 1).

The ordinance, styled “Ordinance No. 26 of 1923,” makes it an offense, and imposes' a penalty of fine and imprisonment, for any person, firm, or corporation to ow(n or conduct a junk business, or to possess "any junk, within a designated and so-called fire district, unless the junk is kept in a brick building.

The judge of the city court ruled that all doubts about…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. ConradSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. City of New Orleans v. Southern Auto Wreckers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. Harry's Hardware, Inc. v. ParsonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. West v. Town of WinnsboroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  5. West v. Town of WinnsboroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API