Legal Opinion

Van Buren v. Plainfield Trust Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 15, 1941No. Docket 129/692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward M. Van Buren, Sr., in his lifetime was an insurance broker in New York. Complainant, Edward M. Van Buren, Jr., was in that business with his father. The Plainfield Trust Company is the executor and trustee under the will of Edward M. Van Buren, Sr., deceased.

In the fifth paragraph of his will the father gave to his son "the general insurance business which is now being conducted by me in the City of New York." In the second paragraph he provided: "* * *

"(c) All other personal effects, acquired by me prior to my marriage to my wife, Ruth M. Van Buren, including books, pictures,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coyle v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Murphy v. MurphyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. Melosh v. MeloshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Frey v. DemarestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863
  5. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Brauburger v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Matter of Estate of YablickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Mills v. Montclair Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API