Legal Opinion
Kervick v. Bontempo
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 7, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
On February 25, 1959 the Law Division entered a declaratory judgment which determined that the New Jersey Water Bond Act of 1958 (L. 1958, c. 35) N. J. S. A. 58:22-19 note, was lawfully enacted and 'that bonds issued thereunder would be direct general obligations of the State. Thereafter the plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified on our own motion. See B. B. 1:10-1 (a).
The Few Jersey Water Supply Law of 1958 (L. 1958, c. 34) N. J. S. A. 58:22-1 et seq. set forth the Legislature’s water resources and supply program…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Twin City Bank v. NebekerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Millard v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mikell v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Rosencranz v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Dalton v. State Property and Buildings CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Christopher Burgos v. State of New Jersey (075736)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Dickinson v. FUND FOR SUPPORT OF FREE PUB. SCH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- STATE CONFERENCE-NAACP v. HarveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.