Legal Opinion

Shumsky v. Dime Savings Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Di Giovanna, J.

The decedent, Mike Lawrince, had been a depositor since December 3,1941 in the Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn and since December 3, 1941 in the Brooklyn Savings Bank. It is the plaintiff’s claim that on April 10, 1958 the decedent signed, transferred, set over and gave her the bankbooks and the money on deposit as a gift to be hers forever *21after; that she accepted and retained the bankbooks as her property and that she is now the owner and holder of the bankbooks and is entitled to the withdrawal of the moneys on deposit.

Mike Lawrince died intestate on May 21, 1958 with no known heirs.

This…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Williamson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  4. Adler v. LeveneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. In re the Estate of AdlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of NabifAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API