Legal Opinion
(PC) Fuentes v. Manning
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 11, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00386Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID FUENTES, SR., No. 2:23-0386 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MR. MANNING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants’ 18 motion to compel discovery responses is before the Court. As discussed below, defendants’ 19 motion is partially granted. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 15) against 22 defendants Mr. Manning and Ms. Kissel for their alleged failure to protect…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.