Legal Opinion

In re Cheyenne QQ.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), entered April 7, 2006, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to *1045Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of two of respondent’s children.

The circumstances leading to the placement of two of respondent’s four children are set forth in our recent decision addressing an appeal from an earlier order in this proceeding (37 AD3d 977 [2007]). The current appeal must be dismissed. The order of placement from which respondent appeals has expired and a subsequent order was entered on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Cheyenne QQ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Norbert YY.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re Jolyssa EE.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Leighton v. BazanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Kiearah P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Marshall v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API