Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Bradford

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. 2008-JP-01989-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRandolph, Justice

I

¶ 26. Notwithstanding the deference we accord the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance, I am constrained to dissent to the sanctions recommended by the Commission and adopted by the majority. The sanctions are woefully inadequate and nearly naught to the offenses, as opposed to “ought [to] fit the offense.” In re Bailey, 541 So.2d 1036, 1039 (Miss.1989). The sanctions imposed fail to adequately address the multitude of separate offenses and fail to consider collectively the multiple acts of misconduct exhibited by Judge Bradford. Essentially, his overall course of misconduct is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning GarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Miss. Com'n on Jud. Performance v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. COM'N ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE v. SanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API