Security Savings Trust Co. v. Donnell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Jackson Circuit Court. — Son. J. W. Henry, Judge. (1) The sections, 16, 17 and 18, of the charter adopted February 27, 1892, were not amendments of the old sections of -these numbers. The old sections, 16, 17 and 18, were stricken out bodily and the new inserted in lieu thereof.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Jackson Circuit Court. — Son. J. W. Henry, Judge. (1) The sections, 16, 17 and 18, of the charter adopted February 27, 1892, were not amendments of the old sections of -these numbers. The old sections, 16, 17 and 18, were stricken out bodily and the new inserted in lieu thereof. Hence the new sections were not amendments of the former sections and could not apply to bills issued under them, which bills were complete in all things as to their issuance and records prior to the adoption of the new sections. (2) The language of the new sections shows conclusively that their…
1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.
This is an action to enforce a tax bill, issued August 1, 1890, for the construction of a sidewalk in front of defendant’s lot in Kansas City. The suit was commenced August 1, 1892. The circuit court held the tax bill nonenforcible, because tho plaintiff failed to file the notice of suit with the city treasurer, as required by amended section 18, article 9, of the city charter; and from a judgment in defendant’s favor, plaintiff appealed.
At the date of the issue of the tax bill, the Kansas City ■charter provided that it should be a lien on the property charged therewith for two years…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee v. SneedSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Moore v. . MausertNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Plum v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Gage v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- West v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901