Legal Opinion

Jenkins & Boyle v. Rogers

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1939No. 33509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

This suit was originally begun in the Chancery Court of Grenada County by the Franklin Life Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation, for the use and benefit of Jenkins & Boyle, a co-partnership insurance agency at Clarksdale, Mississippi, and sought reimbursement on behalf of such insurance agency, under the equitable doctrine of subrogation, against Amos L. Rogers, Mrs. L. T. Hayden, D. K. Hayden and T. L. Guyton, defendants therein, on the ground that in the year 1934 the defendant Amos L. Rogers was employed by the Franklin Life Insurance Company as an insurance agent or solicitor, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshal v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  2. McDowell v. MinorMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Tully v. HerrinMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  4. McClave-Brooks Co. v. Belzoni Oil WorksMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Eagle Lumber & Supply Co. v. PeytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canton Farm Equipment, Inc. v. RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API