Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
I XiAS : AUSTIN,TEXA~ November 8, 1948 Hon. R. A. Smoot Schmid, Member Board of Pardons and Paroles Austin, Texas Opinion No. V-712 Re: Construction of Articles 921 and 922, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, pertaining to trial of is- 9~6~ of, Insanity arising after conviction. Dear Sir: Since we received your request for an opinion, you have orally advised us that answers to the two here- inafter stated questions will suffice. These questions are : 1. What court ore courts have jurlsdlc- tion to try the issue of insanity of a con- vict arising while he Is out of the peniten- tiary on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Escue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Fultz v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- McKibben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940