Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1948No. V-712Published

1Opinion of the Court

I XiAS : AUSTIN,TEXA~ November 8, 1948 Hon. R. A. Smoot Schmid, Member Board of Pardons and Paroles Austin, Texas Opinion No. V-712 Re: Construction of Articles 921 and 922, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, pertaining to trial of is- 9~6~ of, Insanity arising after conviction. Dear Sir: Since we received your request for an opinion, you have orally advised us that answers to the two here- inafter stated questions will suffice. These questions are : 1. What court ore courts have jurlsdlc- tion to try the issue of insanity of a con- vict arising while he Is out of the peniten- tiary on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Escue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Fultz v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. McKibben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API