Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooley v. Urban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 2003Published

1Dissent

Scudder and Hayes, JJ. (dissenting):

We respectfully dissent. In our view, defendant Albert J. Urban established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact whether Urban was negligent. In support of the motion, Urban submitted his deposition testimony. Urban testified that he was traveling northbound on Harlem Road in the Town of West Seneca at approximately 30 to 35 miles per hour when a vehicle traveling southbound and being driven by defendant Raymond J. Cooley (Cooley) failed to yield the right-of-way and turned left in front of Urban’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stiles v. County of DutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Barile v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Galvin v. ZachollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Zadins v. PommervilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API